Legal Opinion
Valente v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 4, 2010No. 2:08-mj-00225PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
MICHAEL R. MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 123), Plaintiffs Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 137) and Defendant’s Reply Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 141).
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doe v. College of WoosterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- Han v. Univ. of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Metro Urgent Care & Family Medical Center v. State Farm Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Patel v. Univ. of ToledoOhio Court of Claims · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.