Anthony v. United Telephone Co. of Ohio
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WELLS, District Judge.
This case is currently before the Court on defendant United Telephone Co. of Ohio’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
On 22 April 1999, plaintiffs Cathy and Oliver Anthony filed a complaint against United Telephone Co. Ohio, aka Sprint (“Sprint”), alleging violations of the Americans' with Disabilities Act of 1990; 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Buckman-Peirson v. BrannonOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Spinks v. TruGreen Landcare, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- Berry v. Frank's Auto Body Carstar, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Potoma v. Cleveland Clinic FoundationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025