Legal Opinion

Bell v. Romaine

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill for injunction to restrain defendant from prosecuting a suit at law. Motion to dissolve injunction on bill and answer.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant, on the 28th of April, 1875, gave to the defendant his bond of that date, secured by his mortgage upon land in Paterson, for the payment of $12,786.66 in five years from that time, with interest thereon, payable semiannually on the 28th of October and April in each year, at the rate of seven per cent, per annum. The bond contained a special condition, which, according to the statements of the declaration in the suit at law on the bond, was, that if any default be made in the payment of the interest or any part thereof on the day when the same was made payable,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingersoll & Brother v. Hahne & Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  2. Posselt v. D'EspardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lettieri v. MistrettaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Brown v. Royal Battery Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. COLUMBIA S. & L. v. EasterlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  4. Glorsky v. WexlerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API