Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hancock

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1902No. 4,054PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Washington Circuit Court; D. M. Alspaugh, Judge. Action by Henry W. Baker against George S. Hancock for malpractice. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Tbe complaint was in four paragraphs. In the amended first paragraph it was averred that the appellee was, in March, 1897, engaged in the practice of medicine and surgery at Oampbellsburg, Washington county, Indiana; that appellant was suffering from an ailment of the nose which he supposed to be nasal catarrh, and went to appellee for treatment; that appellee negligently examined appellant’s nose and told him that he had cancer of the nose and advised him to have it treated at once, to which appellant consented; that appellee proceeded to treat *458the same, and negligently applied some local…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Small v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Nelson v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Hitchcock v. BurgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Worster v. CaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. McGulpin v. BessmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API