Legal Opinion
Feigenbaum v. New Britain Housing Site Development Agency
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 18, 1973PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
The defendant, in eminent domain proceedings, took property belonging to the plaintiffs in the city of New Britain for redevelopment purposes. See General Statutes, c. 130. Pursuant to § 8-129, the defendant filed a statement of compensation with the clerk of the Superior Court for Hartford County for the taking, determining the amount to be paid as $89,690. The property taken consisted of land and buildings and certain equipment used in the plaintiffs’ scrap-metal business. The premises were located near the downtown section of New Britain in an A-2 residential zone and had been used for a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Moss v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Housing Authority v. LustigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- United States v. Leland Sowards and Ruth Sowards, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hensley v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- City of Meriden v. Highway CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Wronowski v. Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.