Watts v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge.
Teresa Watts appeals the dismissal of her Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim against her employer United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). The court granted UPS judgment as a matter of law on the grounds that Watts’s claim was preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), and was untimely under the six-month statute of limitations. Because § 301 does not preempt a claim brought in federal court under the ADA, we REVERSE and REMAND for a new trial on Watts’s ADA claim.
I
Teresa Watts began working for UPS in 1990 at its Hamilton, Ohio…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. IlwuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Berry v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Athan v. U.S. SteelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. IlwuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Robinson v. V&S Detroit Galvanizing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.