Legal Opinion
Berry v. Coastal International Security, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1420PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Theodore Berry brought this action against his employer, Coastal International Security, Inc., in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, alleging age discrimination and retaliation in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C. Stat. § 14-201.11. After removing the ease to this Court, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Local Civil Rule 7(a) on the grounds that plaintiffs claims are preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bratton v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Washington, Jr. v. Alliedbarton Security Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Coclough v. Akal Sec., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Washington v. Alliedbarton Sec. Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Brown v. Potomac Elec. Power Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.