Legal Opinion

Shav Associates v. Township of Middletown

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided June 13, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIMM, J.T.C.

This is a local property tax matter for the tax year 1989. In addition to the issues of valuation and discrimination, two other issues are involved. One issue involves jurisdiction. It arises from the fact that the municipality filed a petition of appeal with the Monmouth County Board of Taxation on August 14, 1989, and the taxpayer filed a complaint by way of direct appeal with the Tax Court on the same day. This issue necessitates a consideration of the ruling of the Supreme Court in Union City Associates v. Union City, 115 N.J. 17, 556 A.2d 769 (1989). The second issue deals…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Paper Mill Playhouse v. Millburn TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Borough of Fort Lee v. Hudson Terrace ApartmentsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hull Junction Holding Corp. v. Princeton BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996
  2. American Cyanamid Co. v. Wayne TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998
  3. Harrison Realty Corp. v. Town of HarrisonNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  4. City of Atlantic City v. GinnettiNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998
  5. City of Atlantic City v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.New Jersey Tax Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API