Legal Opinion
City of Atlantic City v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided May 16, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIMM, J.T.C.
This is Chapter III in the ongoing saga of dual filings for the same property for the same tax year, one filing in the Tax Court and one filing in a county board of taxation. The filings were made under N.J.S.A. 54:3-21, which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
A taxpayer feeling aggrieved by the assessed valuation of his property, or feeling that he is discriminated against by the assessed valuation of other property in the county, or a taxing district which may feel discriminated against by the assessed valuation of property in the taxing district, ..., may on or before…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Lally v. CopygraphicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Lally v. CopygraphicsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Schneider v. City of East OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Atlantic v. Ace Gaming, LLCNew Jersey Tax Court · 2006
- Greate Bay Hotel & Casino v. City of AtlanticNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Austin v. Township of PembertonNew Jersey Tax Court · 2010
- City of Atlantic City v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.New Jersey Tax Court · 2002