Legal Opinion

Alleman v. Wheeler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1885No. 11,010PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

Action by Amzi L. "Wheeler against Philip S. Alleman upon the latter’s endorsement of a promissory note, as follows :

“ ¡§1,000. Plymouth, Indiana, January 23d, 1879.
“ One day after date, for value received, we, or either of us, promise to pay P. S. Alleman, or order, one thousand dollars, at his office in Plymouth, Ind., with interest at the rate of ten per cent, after maturity, and with ten per cent, attorney’s fees, without any relief from valuation and appraisement laws. W. W. Duff.
“ Eeuben Kaley.”

Endorsed: “P. S. Alleman.”

The complaint averred that when the note became due the plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaver v. EhleNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. Herrick v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Huston v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Davis v. DohertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Tam v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Swanson v. Slagal, AdministratrixIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Lewis v. AlbertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Carter v. RichartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Indiana Stone Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API