Legal Opinion

Clontz v. Clontz

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1980No. 7920DC78PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The only question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict awarding compensation for improvements made by plaintiff on defendants’ property.

By G.S. 1-340, the betterments statute, North Carolina provides for recovery of the value of improvements made upon another’s property. However, this section does not create an independent cause of action. Rather, it embodies only a defensive right, declaring that an owner of land who seeks and obtains the aid of the court to enforce his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Pitt v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Rhyne v. . SheppardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Guy v. GuyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Lee v. BirCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Parslow v. ParslowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Rongotes v. PridemoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API