Legal Opinion

Son v. Pressed Steel Car Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THACHER, District Judge.

Since the original argument of this motion, the matter has been fully reargued and thoroughly presented upon written briefs. It appears from the .decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit in Le Roy v. De Vry Corporation, 16 F.(2d) 18, to which no reference was made upon the oral argument, that the conclusion then reached that the motion should be denied was wrong.

The complaint is the usual bill in equity for patent infringement. It was filed three days, and subpcena was served one day, before expiration of patent. Judge Hough, in his opinion in the Le…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Flat Slab Patents Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  4. Tompkins v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Condit Electrical Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Allied Metal Stamping Co. v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
  3. Miller v. DAYBROOK-OTTAWA CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  4. Kilgore Mfg. Co. v. Triumph Explosives, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  5. Wagner v. Corn Products Refining Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API