State v. Weyerhauser
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Proceedings in the district court for Itasca county to enforce payment of taxes for the year 1894. Judgment in favor of the state having been entered in accordance with the mandate of this court, pursuant to the decision reported in 68 Minn. 358, at the request of defendants the case was certified to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
These proceedings were under the same statute, and are identical in all material facts with those of the same title considered in 68 Minn. 353, 71 N. W. 265, in which the statute (Laws 1893, c. 151, G. S. 1894, § 1633), was assailed as being in violation of certain provisions of the constitution of the state. In addition to the objections there urged against the validity of the statute, it is now urged that it is in violation of certain provisions of the federal constitution, particularly article 1, § 10, providing that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. WeyerhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- W. J. Armstrong Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Iowa National Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Meadowbrook Manor, Inc. v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.