Legal Opinion
Cate v. Oldham
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 3, 1984No. 63775PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
450 So.2d 224 (1984)
Kenneth R. CATE, et al., Appellants/Petitioners,
v.
Gordon G. OLDHAM, Jr., et al., Appellees/Respondents.
No. 63775.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 3, 1984.
Dennis J. Wall of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabaniss & Burke, Orlando, for appellants/petitioners.
David R. Best, and John M. Robertson of Robertson, Williams, Duane, Lewis & Ranson, Orlando, for appellees/respondents.
ADKINS, Justice.
This cause is before us on discretionary review of two questions certified to this Court by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(6), Fla. Const. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kenneth R. Cate, Esquire, and Maher, Overchuck, Langa & Cate, a Florida Association v. Gordon G. Oldham, Jr., and State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Tatum Bros. Real Estate & Investment Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- City of Long Beach v. BozekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. James Scott PendergraftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Londono v. Turkey Creek, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Lawrence T. Newman and Beverly R. Newman v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.