American Surety Co. v. Pryor
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case was submitted under rule 46, and the opinion of the court was r delivered by
ANDERSON, C. J.:
It may be conceded that upon the trial of one for embezzlement other acts of the accused of a similar nature or character can be shown on the inquiry whether the act in question was done knowingly and intentionally. Lang v. State, 97 Ala. 41, 12 South. 183. This evidence, however, is admissible as bearing upon the guilt or innocence of -the accused in the criminal prosecution only, and not necessarily in a suit for malicious prosecution, as the guilt or innocence was adjudicated by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clarke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Hanchey v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Abingdon Mills v. GroganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- O'Neal v. McKinnaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Clinton Mining Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maring-Crawford Motor Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- American Surety Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- McMullen v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ex Parte NolenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Brackin v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.