Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Nolen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1931No. 6 Div. 900PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Petitioner has an action pending seeking damages in counts of slander and libel. J. Hudson Barker was one of the defendants in said cause to whom petitioner submitted a large number of interrogatories under the statute. Section 7764 et seq., Code 1923. A number of these he declined to answer, and upon motion in the trial court his refusal to do so was sustained. Petitioner has pursued the proper remedy by mandamus for a review of this ruling. Ex parte State ex rel. Tuck, 217 Ala. 143, 115 So. 155; Ex parte State ex rel. St. Peters M. Baptist Church, 212 Ala. 365, 102 So. 793.

It is contended…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Culver v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Phillips v. BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Collins v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Easley v. MossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Altman v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Ex Parte RowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Ex Parte CypressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Ex Parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API