Legal Opinion

Brackin v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 1940No. 4 Div. 133PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Suit to recover damages for malicious prosecution.

Upon conclusion of the evidence the. court, at the request of defendant, gave the general affirmative charge in his behalf. From a verdict for defendant, and judgment, thereon, the plaintiff brings this appeal.

In actions for malicious prosecutions the burden is on the plaintiff to show want of probable cause. And this court seems to be committed to the proposition that the acquittal on final trial of one accused of crime does not tend to show a want of probable cause for believing him guilty of the offense charged. Standard Oil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parisian Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Gulsby v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. McMullen v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Molton Realty Co. v. MurchisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Birwood Paper Company v. DamskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Key v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. BatesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API