Legal Opinion

In Re the Guardianship of the Estate of Smart

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1934No. 2087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BANKS, J. (Perry, C. J., dissenting in part.)

On March 7, 1932, the Trent Trust Company filed a petition in the court of domestic relations asking leave to resign the guardianship of the estate of Richard Smart, a minor. On March 12,1932, the resignation was accepted and Alfred W. Carter was appointed as guardian. On March 17, 1932, the resigning guardian filed its final account. This account was referred to two masters. On September 3, 1932, the masters filed their report in which they recommended that certain items of investment made by the retiring guardian be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Gould v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  4. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Kimball v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Willard v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API