Legal Opinion

Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. Cadinha

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1944No. 2464PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

This is a suit in equity for an accounting and the setting aside of two consecutive conveyances of property which, it is alleged, were made by the respondents when the property was under assignment for benefit of creditors. It is brought by the petitioners as objecting creditors in repudiation of these conveyances against respondent Cadinha as assignee for benefit of creditors, respondent Davenport as intermediate transferee, and respondent C & D Dress Company, Limited, as ultimate transferee, the petitioners claiming that the transfers constituted a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Boothe v. FiestTexas Supreme Court · 1891

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Paul H. Schwendener, Inc. v. Jupiter Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Yin Tai Lum v. Hee KwongHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Watumull v. EttingerHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Willard v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1971
  5. Akana v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API