Gurnik v. Lee
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Plaintiff-appeliant Jo Lynn Dickinson (Dickinson) appeals from the trial court's determination that the funds owed to her by defendant-appellee The Travel Trade, Inc. (Travel) were not "wages" under Ind. Code 22-2-5-2 (1988), and she also claims that the trial court erred when it refused to pierce Travel's corporate veil to reach defendants-appellees M. Monroe Lee (Lee) and the Lee Corporation of Indiana, Inc. (Lee Corp.).1
We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the trial court's judgment reveal that in October, 1983, Dickinson,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Die & Mold, Inc. v. WesternIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Get-N-Go, Inc. v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. David E. Van DivinerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Stacey-Rand, Inc. v. J.J. Holman, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Four Seasons Manufacturing, Inc. v. 1001 Coliseum, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Aronson v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.