Richards & Associates, Inc. v. Boney
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge.
This cause comes on before the undersigned United States District Judge on the defendants’ motions pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court has conducted a hearing on these motions at which time argument was received and after considering the entire record and the parties’ briefs, the court makes the following order.
CLAIMS BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
In May, 1976, the plaintiff Richards & Associates, Inc., contracted with the Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, to install…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stokes v. Southeast Hotel Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1994
- Connolly v. FoudreeDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
- Burgess v. AndrewsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Creech v. DenningDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993