Legal Opinion

Smith v. Strayer University Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 13, 2015No. 1:14cv565 (JCC/JFA)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.

This action, brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Dkt. 49.] For the following reasons, the Court will grant the motion in part as to Counts Two, Three, and Four. Otherwise, the motion is denied as to Count One.

I. Material Facts

The following material facts, as recited in' Defendant’s Statement of Facts [Dkt. 50-1] (“Def.’s Stmt.”) and Plaintiffs Statement of Facts…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brady v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  2. Johnson v. New York State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
  3. Rogers v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plaintif of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  4. Romeka v. RadAmerica IICourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Salmoiraghi v. Veritiss, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API