Legal Opinion
Romeka v. RadAmerica II
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 27, 2022No. 1207/20Published
1Opinion of the Court
Romeka v. RadAmerica II, LLC, ET AL., No. 1207, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Eyler, Deborah S., J. MARYLAND HEALTH CARE WORKER WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT (HCWWPA OR ACT), HEALTH OCCUPATIONS ARTICLE §§ 1-502 THROUGH 1-506 --- ACTION FOR VIOLATION OF HCWWPA --- PROOF OF CAUSATION --- McDONNELL DOUGLAS EVIDENTIARY FRAMEWORK --- SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Ms. Romeka worked as a chief radiation therapist for RadAmerica, which supplied radiation treatment health care workers to a hospital’s radiation oncology center. Over a period of 2 ½ weeks, her superiors investigated complaints about her…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.