Church of Religious Science v. Fox
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice:
This is an appeal from summary judgment entered by the Court of Chancery in favor of the defendants on the issue of laches in this action for an accounting.
I
The following determinative facts are uncontroverted on the record before us:
Benjamin Fox, defendant herein, was employed as general manager by Hugh H. Eby, Inc. (hereinafter “Eby”) from 1943 to 1947. Eby was engaged in the production of electronic devices. During Fox’s tenure, he was credited with the development of several new articles, including a certain new “spring binding post” for which Fox made a patent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Lank v. SteinerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Methode Electronics, Inc. v. Elco Corporation and Benjamin FoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Bush v. Hillman Land Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
- Bush v. Hillman Land Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hood v. McConemyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Gotham Partners, L.P. v. Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Husband (G.T.B.) v. Wife (G.R.)Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Weller v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1972