Legal Opinion

Creason v. Creason

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1932No. Docket No. 8185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

— Plaintiffs and defendants are the children of W. J. Creason, deceased. On August 17, 1925, W. J. Creason, aged seventy-six years, shortly after becoming blind made and executed a certain deed and entered into an escrow agreement with one J. P. Mandl that upon the death of the grantor the deed should be delivered to defendant Prank L. Creason.

The first cause of action in the complaint is in the nature of quiet title. The second cause of action and the answer thereto raise issues of incompetency, undue influence, confidential relations, independent advice and want of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Brown v. Canadian Indus. Alcohol Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In Re Estate of HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fair Oaks Bank v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laherty v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Bush v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Estate of HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API