Legal Opinion

Rough & Ready Lumber Co. v. Blue Sky Forest Products

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. 87-206-J-1; CA A62377PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on a directed verdict for Blue Sky Forest Products (defendant). A directed verdict is proper only when reasonable people could draw but one conclusion from the evidence. James v. Carnation Co., 278 Or 65, 69, 562 P2d 1192 (1977). We review the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff to decide whether a jury could reasonably have concluded that it should prevail. Paulson v. Western Life Insurance Co., 292 Or 38, 40 n 1, 636 P2d 935 (1981).

Defendant is a lumber broker. Plaintiff is a lumber mill operator. In the fall of 1986, Miller, a representative…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Paulson v. Western Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jones v. NunleyOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Doe v. SeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Larrison v. Moving Floors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Miller v. Mill Creek Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Checkley v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API