Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 25, 2017No. 17-11879-PPublished

1DissentMartin, Circuit Judge

A judge of this court asked for en banc consideration of Thomas Arthur’s access to the court claim. A majority of judges has now voted against en banc review. I would have preferred for the whole court to consider Mr. Arthur’s claim, so I respectfully dissent.

The State of Alabama plans to' execute Mr. Arthur tonight. Mr. Arthur has made *1260the quite modest request of Alabama that his attorney, who will be with him when the State takes his life, be allowed to have a telephone with her at the time of Mr. Arthur’s execution. This is so the lawyer would have a way to contact the courts if something…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Grayson v. DunnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API