Legal Opinion

M-B-A

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3480PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

23 I&N Dec. 474

(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3480 In re M-B-A-, Respondent Decided September 24, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A Nigerian convicted of a drug offense in the United States failed to establish eligibility for deferral of removal under Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture because the evidence she presented regarding the enforcement of Decree No. 33 of the Nigerian National Drug Law Enforcement Agency against individuals similarly situated to her was insufficient to demonstrate that it is more…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. W-G-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
  2. Denis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. A-KBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
  4. Sobura Lasu v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  5. Boto Jima v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API