Smith v. Smith
New York Court of Chancery
The bill in this cause was filed by the wife against the husband for a divorce a mensa et thora, on the ground of cruelty. It distinctly set forth the time and place of marriage and the name of the minister who officiated at the ceremony. The pleading was sworn to. An application was now made for temporary alimony and money to carry on the suit.
Read the full summary
The bill in this cause was filed by the wife against the husband for a divorce a mensa et thora, on the ground of cruelty. It distinctly set forth the time and place of marriage and the name of the minister who officiated at the ceremony. The pleading was sworn to. An application was now made for temporary alimony and money to carry on the suit. The defendant, by way of meeting it, read his plea, sworn to, which unequivocally denied his ever having been married to the complainant. It was unaccompanied by any answer,
1Opinion of the Court
The ' Vice-Chancellor,
A novel question is presented here. Although the defendant denies á marriage de facto, he . , , has not denied cohabitation, or living together, nor the great cruelty set forth in the bill. .At this stage of the suit, I do not think the plea sufficient to prevent the granting of the application. In Smyth v. Smyth, 2 Adams, 254, the!' court, in effect, granted temporary alimony, when in point of form it could not allot it to the wife until the fact of marriage was either proved or confessed by the.husband.
I shall direct a reference to -a master to 'ascertain the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- York v. YorkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Lau v. LauNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- Vincent v. VincentNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
- Hover v. Hover, Circuit Court of the 14th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Bay County1870