York v. York
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Oov/rt. Action for divorce. Motion for temporary alimony sustained._ Defendant appeals. Tbe necessary facts appear in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
Tbe answer of defendant denies bis marriage to plaintiff. In support of bis motion, plaintiff presented the affidavits of George Glick, James L. Williams and of herfather, S. C. Barnbart. George Glick states that in the spring of 1870, J. B. York introduced to bim Eliza A. Barnbart, and afterward said sbe was a good girl and a good housekeeper, and that be bad a good notion to marry her; and that afterward, in Marshalltown, be introduced plaintiff as bis wife,'and said that be and Eliza bad just got married. James S. Williams states that in May or June, 1870, in Marshalltown, defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- State ex rel. Lloyd v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.