Legal Opinion

Lau v. Lau

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by Annie Lau against Albert Lau. Heard on motion for alimony and counsel fees. Allowance ordered.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

Application for alimony and counsel fee pending suit in wife’s action for separation. No question as to jurisdiction *311of the parties or subject-matter is raised. The parties were married in facie ecclesiae in the state of New Jersey more than 25 years ago when the plaintiff was 19 years of age and the defendant about 26. They have four children: Augusta Schroeder, a widow, aged 24 years; William Lau, 21 years; Annie Williams, 17 years; and Albert Lau, Jr., aged 13 years. Besides these there were three other children who died in infancy. The plaintiff claims that in .1900, 13 years after the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. North v. NorthNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  3. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
  4. Grove v. ZumbroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1858
  5. Vincent v. VincentNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Lazarowicz v. LazarowiczNew York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API