Legal Opinion

Bermingham v. Wilcox

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1898No. S. F. No. 844PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

By the last will and testament of Alfred H. Wilcox the plaintiff and one E. F. Spence were appointed its executors, and certain real and personal property was devised to them in trust for the use and benefit of four minor children of the testator, to be transferred to them respectively as they should arrive at the age of twenty-one years. At the close of the administration of the estate, September 4, 1885, the property so devised in trust was distributed to them in accordance with the terms of the will. In Fovember of that year they reported to and filed with the court their acknowledgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adair v. . BrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Jones's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Blackmon v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Lewis v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API