Legal Opinion
Hassan v. Deutche Bank A.G.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 2007No. 05 Civ. 6555(PKC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge.
The amended complaint in this action alleges one claim for relief: tortious interference with prospective business relations. With the completion of discovery in this action, the defendants, Deutsche Bank A.G. (“Deutsche Bank”) and Jeffrey Baer, now move for summary judgment, asserting that there is no evidence that defendants acted for the sole purpose of injuring plaintiffs or, regardless of their purpose, used means that amounted to a crime, independent tort or were otherwise “extreme and unfair.” Plaintiffs Tariq Has-san and The Buying…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Carvel Corp. v. NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Medtech Products Inc. v. RANIR, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Darby Trading Inc. v. Shell International Trading & Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Friedman v. Coldwater Creek, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- 16161782 Canada Inc. (A Canadian Corporation) and 12018900 Canada Incorporated v. Danylo Mogyl’nyyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.