Legal Opinion
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 4, 2013No. 13 Civ. 1419(PKC)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge.
In a 175-page, 862-paragraph complaint, plaintiff In Touch Concepts, Inc. (“Zcom”) brings this action against defendants. The complaint is neither “short” nor “plain” as required by Rule 8(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P. Counsel for plaintiff is cautioned to be mindful of the mandates of Rule 8(a) in any pleading filed in a federal forum. But for the procedural history of this case, the Court would exercise its authority to dismiss this prolix pleading. See Simmons v. Abruzzo, 49 F.3d 83, 86 (2d Cir.1995); Doe v. Washington Post Co., 12 Civ. 5054, 2012…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Security Plans, Inc. v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Petedge, Inc. v. GargDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Grayson v. Ressler & ResslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Ray Legal Consulting Group v. DijosephDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Gibson v. Sce Grp., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.