Lang v. Burlington Northern Railroad
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Burlington Northern Railroad’s (“Burlington Northern”) motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the basis that this dispute is subject to mandatory arbitration. Alternatively, defendant moves to stay this matter pending arbitration. The Court heard oral argument on November 5, 1993. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted.
I. Background
Plaintiff Larry M. Lang (“Lang”) is a resident of Minnesota. Defendant Burlington Northern is a Delaware…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Asmus v. Pacific BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Johnson v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Amanda S. May v. Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard's William CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Walker v. Air Liquide America Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.