Legal Opinion

Amanda S. May v. Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard's William Carr

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2004No. 03-60759PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Amanda May sued her employer Higbee Co. (d/b/a Dillard’s) and a supervisor for employment discrimination under Title VII. The defendants moved to compel arbitration and to stay the judicial proceedings. The district court denied the motion, ruling that May had not assented to her employer’s arbitration program. Concluding that the district court should have ordered arbitration pursuant to the parties’ binding agreement, we reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

May began working at a Dillard’s department store in June 1990, and she later rose to become the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. CMH HOMES v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Iberia Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Cingular Wireless LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Sourcing Unlimited, Inc. v. Asimco International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. Weekley Homes, L.P. v. Rao, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API