United States v. Garfinkel
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant Barry Garfinkel’s objections to a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Floyd E. Boline dated May 19, 1993 (“Report and Recommendation”). Garfinkel objects to the magistrate judge’s recommendation that his motion to dismiss counts 5 through 23 of the indictment (“counts 5 through 23”) or, in the alternative, for a bill of particulars with respect to counts 5 through 23 be denied. Garfinkel also objects to the magistrate judge’s recommendation that his motion to dismiss counts 24 and 25 of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Irving Davis, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ronald C. Smith, M.D., Robert Miltimore and Donald F. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- COSMETIC, TOILETRY & FRAG. ASS'N, INC. v. State of Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1977
- United States v. PiattiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Barry GarfinkelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994