Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry Garfinkel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1994No. 93-3160PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, the government challenges the district court’s order dismissing two counts of the indictment brought against Barry Garfinkel. The two dismissed counts charged Garfinkel with the violation of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. We reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

The grand jury returned a twenty-five count indictment against Garfinkel, a child psychiatrist employed by the University of Minnesota. Garfinkel, the principal investigator for an experimental drug study, was responsible for the clinical…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sicard v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  2. South Dakota v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Bhatti v. Fed. Hous. Fin. AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  4. United States v. McAllisterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  5. United States v. SenoglesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API