Legal Opinion

Ellingson v. Klinger

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 16, 1956No. 17119PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

This action was commenced by service of a rule to show cause, instead of a summons, and petition which should have been denominated a complaint. The material allegations of the petition are that H. S. Chisholm, Incorporated, obtained a money judgment in the Richland County Court on May 13, 1952, against Keith Klinger, execution upon which was returned by the sheriff nulla bona on September 16, 1952; Ellingson Lumber Co., a partnership, recovered judgment in the same court in July 1952 against Keith Klinger in the sum of $2,050.22, execution upon which was returned by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Heyward v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  4. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Isthmian S.S. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Stephens v. RinglingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HS Chisholm, Inc. v. KLINGERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API