Legal Opinion

HS Chisholm, Inc. v. KLINGER

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 16, 1956No. 17119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

229 S.C. 8 (1956)

91 S.E.2d 538

In re H.S. CHISHOLM, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

KEITH KLINGER, Defendant-Appellant. In re R.P. ELLINGSON, M.T.N. ELLINGSON, ROBERT P. ELLINGSON, JR., DONALD ELLINGSON, S.H. ELLINGSON and D.G. BALDERSON, individually and as co-partners doing business under the name and style of Ellingson Lumber Co., Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

KEITH KLINGER, individually and doing business under the name and style of Keith Klinger Lumber Company and Dorothy Klinger, Defendants-Appellants. Ex parte H.S. CHISHOLM, Incorporated, and R.P. ELLINGSON, M.T.N. ELLINGSON, ROBERT P.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Heyward v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  4. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Isthmian S.S. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Stephens v. RinglingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Payne v. Holiday Towers, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. South Carolina National Bank v. Westpac Banking Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1987
  3. Southeastern Equipment Co. v. One 1954 Autocar Diesel TractorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Ex Parte Citizens & Southern National Bank v. First Palmetto State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API