Heyward v. Long
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The four above-entitled proceedings were instituted in the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, in equity, against the respondents, upon a petition or complaint in each case. The allegations contained in the petitions in the four cases are practically identical, with the exception of necessary changes in names and dates.
It is alleged in the four petitions that the plaintiffs are in the possession of their respective offices as State Highway Commissioners of South Carolina, and that the purpose of instituting these proceedings is to enjoin and restrain the respondents who are rival…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Coleman v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Fernández Antonetti v. Corte de Distrito de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
- Gaskin v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Walling v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.