Legal Opinion

Estate of Goldman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 25, 1996No. Docket No. 16970-94UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF SYLVIA P. GOLDMAN, DECEASED, MARSHA GOLDBERG AND LINDA TANENBAUM, CO-EXECUTRICES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Estate of Goldman v. Commissioner

Docket No. 16970-94.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1996-29; 1996 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 28; 71 T.C.M. (CCH) 1896;

January 25, 1996, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Gerald N. Daffner, for petitioner.

Marcie B. Harrison and Theodore R. Leighton, for respondent.

FOLEY, Judge

FOLEY

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

FOLEY, Judge: By notice dated July 11, 1994, respondent determined a deficiency in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  5. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CNT Investors, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
  2. Bergquist v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
  3. Bergquist v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
  4. Bradley J. Bergquist and Angela Kendrick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2008
  5. CNT Investors, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API