Legal Opinion

CNT Investors, LLC v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided March 23, 2015No. Docket No. 27539-08PublishedCited by 12 opinions

C and his wife and related individuals owned appreciated real estate through an S corporation (S). C and the related individuals engaged in a Son-of-BOSS transaction to create outside basis in a purported partnership to which S contributed the appreciated real estate. A series of further transactions left C and the related individuals holding the real estate through the partnership. No party reported recognizing any of the real estate's built-in gain.

Read the full summary

C and his wife and related individuals owned appreciated real estate through an S corporation (S). C and the related individuals engaged in a Son-of-BOSS transaction to create outside basis in a purported partnership to which S contributed the appreciated real estate. A series of further transactions left C and the related individuals holding the real estate through the partnership. No party reported recognizing any of the real estate's built-in gain. For 1999 R determined that the partnership was a sham and adjusted to zero the partnership's reported losses, deductions, distributions,…

1Opinion of the Court

CONTENTS

FINDINGS OF FACT . 164

I. Introducing the Carroll Family . 165

II. Solving the Low Basis Dilemma . 168

III. Selling the Son-of-BOSS Strategy . 171

IV. Achieving the Basis Boost . 173

A. Son-of-BOSS . 174

B. Basis Boost . 176

C. Real Estate Extraction ... 177

V. Reporting the Transactions .. 179

A. CNT’s 1999 Returns . 179

B. CCFH’s 1999 Return . 180

C. Individuals’ 1999 Returns H QO 1 — I

VI. Challenging the Transactions H CO T — !

OPTNTON C\ cc 1—

I. Preliminary Matters . 182

A. When Appellate Venue Matters . 182

B. Why Appellate Venue Does Not Matter Here . 183

II. Timeliness of the FPAA . 186

A.…

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re WylyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
  2. Curtis Inv. Co., LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017
  3. Putanec v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  4. Celia Mazzei v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  5. Alternative Health Care Advocates v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API