Legal Opinion
State v. Hampton
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2006No. CR-03-0033-APPublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 1 On May 16, 2001, Department of Public Safety officers attempted to serve a traffic ticket on Tracy Allen Hampton. 1 The officers went to a house on East Roberts Road in Phoenix, where Hampton had been staying with Charles Findley and Findley’s girlfriend, Tanya Ramsdell, who was five months pregnant. Hampton was not there, but Findley and Ramsdell were. To prove that he was not the man the officers were looking for, Findley showed them a photograph of Hampton, and the officers left.
¶2 Early the next day, Misty Ross and Shaun Geeslin…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BocharskiArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 2007
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.