Legal Opinion
United States v. Krane
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 29, 2010No. 10-30247PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This interlocutory appeal presents, inter alia, the question of whether the Perlman rule survives Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009). Under these circumstances, we conclude that it does, and that we have jurisdiction over this appeal. However, we also conclude that there is no longer a justiciable controversy at issue, and we dismiss the appeal as moot. See In re Grand Jury Proceedings Klayman, 760 F.2d 1490, 1491 (9th Cir.1985) (“We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We agree that the controversy is moot…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re: Grand Jury v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Jane Doe v. Roy BlackCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Holt-Orsted v. City of DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Speer v. Chapter 7 Trustee Tow (In re Royce Homes LP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- United States v. Copar Pumice CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.