In Re: Grand Jury v.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
ABC Corp., John Doe 1, and John Doe 2 are subjects of an ongoing grand jury investigation into an alleged criminal tax scheme.1 As part of that scheme, ABC Corp., under the direction of John Doe 1 and John Doe 2, purchased and subsequently sold numerous companies. These consolidated appeals concern whether documents and testimony relating to legal advice obtained by ABC Corp. in connection with these transactions are shielded by the attorney-client and work product privileges.
When ABC Corp. objected that the Government had improperly served a subpoena…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Lisa Papotto v. Hartford Life & Accident InsurCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- PA Dept. of Ed. v. R. Bagwell PSU v. R. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Jane Doe v. Roy BlackCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- H.E. v. Walter D. Palmer Leadership Learning Partners Charter SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.