Wiege v. Knock
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POSHEIM, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment determining the rights and duties of the parties concerning the water from a well located on private property. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The third-party defendants, Herman W. Piebenga and Esther C. Piebenga, purchased a tract of land south of Rapid City. On part of this property they developed a commercial campground. The tract was platted. One lot, on which a well had been dug and equipped, was sold to the Pieben-gas’ son. In that deed, a perpetual water easement in the well was reserved to the grantors. This lot was subsequently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Putnam v. DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Loughman v. CouchmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Sheffield Water Co. v. Elk Tanning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. PospisilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Peterson v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Townsend v. Yankton Super 8 Motel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Steele v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Springer v. CahoySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.