Legal Opinion

Wiege v. Knock

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1980No. 12824PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSHEIM, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment determining the rights and duties of the parties concerning the water from a well located on private property. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The third-party defendants, Herman W. Piebenga and Esther C. Piebenga, purchased a tract of land south of Rapid City. On part of this property they developed a commercial campground. The tract was platted. One lot, on which a well had been dug and equipped, was sold to the Pieben-gas’ son. In that deed, a perpetual water easement in the well was reserved to the grantors. This lot was subsequently…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Putnam v. DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Loughman v. CouchmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Sheffield Water Co. v. Elk Tanning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. PospisilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Peterson v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Townsend v. Yankton Super 8 Motel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Steele v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Springer v. CahoySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API