Legal Opinion
United States v. $307,970.00 in United States Currency
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 26, 2015No. 4:12-CV-136-FLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on motion of claimants Cirilia Garcia, Lucia Covarrubias and Apolinar Garcia-Ancelmo for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, (DE 90), for the return of seized property. As discuss below, the court segregated parts of the instant motion, promoting focus at this juncture only to the extent claimants rest argument on any pre-suit probable cause requirement. In this respect, issues raised have been briefed fully. For reasons that follow, claimants’ motion in this part is denied, the parties…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. $307,970.00, in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- United States v. Approximately $13,205.54 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020