Legal Opinion
Anderson-Friberg, Inc. v. Justin R. Clary & Son, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 22, 1951PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WE-INFELD, District Judge.
This is an action under the Sherman and Clayton Acts for treble damages and for a permanent injunction. 1 The plaintiffs charge that the defendants are engaged in a conspiracy and combination to restrain and monopolize interstate commerce by agreeing with each other that all -finishing work on granite stone imported into the Greater New York area shall be done in New York City and that no finished or partly finished stone shall be brought into the area from Vermont or elsewhere.
The present motion is one for a preliminary injunction. Several defendants have moved for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Atlas Building Products Co. v. Diamond Block & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Flood v. KuhnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.