Legal Opinion

Express Publishing Co. v. Levenson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1956No. 13027Published

1Opinion

*359On Rehearing

Appellee Meyer S. Levenson, by his motion for rehearing, . correctly ■ states that the liability of an agent .for a-non-existent principal is somewhat different from the liability of an agent for a principal who is' incompetent and may disaffirm a contract, such as an infant, or one who is under disability of coverture. Restatement, Agency, § 332; 2 Am.Jur., Agency, § 318; 3 C.J.S., Agency, § 215d. We find no Texas precedents, hut Goldfinger v. Doherty, 153 Misc. 826, 276 N.Y.S. 289, 293, discusses the circumstances under which the agent is liable in the -event the principal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Hall v. . LauderdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Thilmany v. Iowa Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Goldfinger v. DohertyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API