Express Publishing Co. v. Levenson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
*359On Rehearing
Appellee Meyer S. Levenson, by his motion for rehearing, . correctly ■ states that the liability of an agent .for a-non-existent principal is somewhat different from the liability of an agent for a principal who is' incompetent and may disaffirm a contract, such as an infant, or one who is under disability of coverture. Restatement, Agency, § 332; 2 Am.Jur., Agency, § 318; 3 C.J.S., Agency, § 215d. We find no Texas precedents, hut Goldfinger v. Doherty, 153 Misc. 826, 276 N.Y.S. 289, 293, discusses the circumstances under which the agent is liable in the -event the principal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hall v. . LauderdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Thilmany v. Iowa Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Goldfinger v. DohertyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934